counter free hit unique web
Send As SMS

Monday, April 11, 2005

My new wheelchair

Posted by John B. Kelly

I have a new wheelchair(mine is blue)! And I already love it. Usually it takes months to really "move in," because a new wheelchair, at least for us severely disabled types, functions as part of the body -- like a shell for a turtle or maybe a new skin for a snake. And you never know whether a new chair will really work out until you get in and try to live in it. I had originally ordered a Quickie wheelchair, but sent it back because I just hated it.

Every wheelchair sits a little different -- even a change from a slightly softer and more curved backrest to a new one can ruin one's balance. (Some people get new wheelchairs and then never use them, because their bodies have grown into their old chairs so completely that just about any new wheelchair would take away some precious ability or balance.)

And then there is learning to drive a new chair, which is especially challenging for me because I use a sip/puff drive: it operates on a "latched" system (like a light switch) rather than the "momentary" system of your typical wheelchair with a joystick, so I have to know exactly how hard to puff and sip to "go" and, especially, to "stop." My new wheelchair takes more pressure for both, so I keep crashing into things, thinking that I have stopped.

Like the last two chairs I had, my new one is an Invacare (yes, a combination of "invalid" and "care", but they make nice wheelchairs), but it is radically different because it has mid-wheel drive, along with an extra pair of wheels at the back for a total of six. All my previous three chairs had rearwheel drive (and a mere four wheels), which made turning a slow and space-consuming process. Seriously, I could not even get out of my own bedroom without crashing into the door frame, and had a lot of trouble getting into my living room from the front hallway (my apartment was renovated tack in 1980, before ADA standards were in place). It's kind of frustrating not to be able to get around in your own apartment.

The new wheelchair drives much more like a Bobcat, the little construction vehicle that turns from the center rather than rear. So now I go through a doorway as if I were walking, taking the center path, rather than the wide turn that a tractor trailer has to make.

Two other features of my new chair remind me of walking: I now have control over my general direction and speed, rather than being at the total mercy of inclines and cross slopes.

Although people who walk generally don't notice pitched sidewalks (usually sloping from a building towards the curb), they just wear out wheelchair users. In my old chairs, rolling along a pitched-left sidewalk consisted of puffing right about every two seconds. Makes it quite difficult to carry on a conversation. (I have actually crashed trying to finish a sentence in time). The new wheelchair stays almost completely straight, which makes for a nice, secure feeling. Lots of time to look around at the scenery rather than trying to survive.

This wheelchair also compulsively adds and subtracts power based on the incline of my surface. Going up a ramp, a little extra power; going down, a little bit of a drag on the motor. That means I don't have that out-of-control sensation of freewheeling down a hill, or the terrifying experience of slowing down so much going up a ramp that the chair starts to turn dangerously to one side.

Unfortunately, the chair also rides a bit stiffer than my old wheelchair, even with the pneumatic tires that I had switched in. But the six wheels make for quite a bit more safety, and I can take much more dangerous ramps than I used to.

It really would be a great solution to access issues if wheelchairs could easily and comfortably climb curbs, stairs, etc., but in the meantime it still means slogging away for that ramp promised three years ago, and trying to get rid of that damn brick under our wheels and canes.

Sunday, April 10, 2005

Globe Magazine Gives Thumbs down to Brick Sidewalks

Posted by John B. Kelly

In a great boost to the "dump the bricks" cause, Monica Collins of the Boston Globe wrote a fantastic one-page essay in today's Globe Magazine, page 16. The piece will be available at this link for the next four weeks.

Collins said all anyone needs to know with the words:

Concrete sidewalks with brick accents not only solve the walking and rolling problems, they are cheaper, too.
NAG's Kelly gets the first and last word in the story, and Chris Hart from Adaptive Environments, Ann Hershfang from WalkBoston, and Michael Muehe from the Cambridge Commission for Persons with Disabilities help knock nails into the coffin of brick sidewalks. Collins writes about her conversion experience:

Until my consciousness was raised, I blamed myself when I snagged on a bad brick and took a tumble. "After you fall, you stand up and you say, 'Stupid me. Why did I do that?' " says Christopher Hart of Adaptive Environments, a local firm specializing in accessible design. "But it's not you. It was the physical surface you were walking on."

And that is the key to our success: when enough people realize that they don't like brick either, the bricks will be gone. In just a few decades, bricks will be a bad memory of a bad decision.
Collins nails the city good on its initial, very pathetic, attempt to wiggle out of its legal responsibility to ensure that its sidewalks are compliant. As she sums up in her final paragraph, concrete sidewalks with a brick "accent" along the curb are far preferable to all-brick:

Such a design would work on Huntington Avenue, where a lumpy sidewalk built in 2003 with Old City Hall pavers poses an obstacle for well-heeled Boston Symphony-goers and wheelchair riders. The sidewalk there is the subject of a lawsuit by Kelly's Neighborhood Access Group. The state's Architectural Access Board agrees and has ordered the city to fix the misshapen walkways around Symphony Hall and Gainsborough Street. Initially, the city denied responsibility and pinned the blame on the MBTA, which built the sidewalk. Spinetto now promises the work will be done by July 1. Kelly holds out for concrete: "Concrete is the only guarantee of a smooth path of travel. They can put the brick near the edge, and we can all admire it from a distance."

The sidewalk isn't exactly the subject of a "lawsuit," but a complaint before the Architectural Access Board. No lawyers involved! (Not that there would be anything wrong with that...)

Saturday, April 09, 2005

Huntington Avenue Timeline

Posted by John B. Kelly, who is feeling much better

Part One: The Gentrifiers Strike Back
Mid 1990s:
Huntington Avenue redesign process takes place, ostensibly to bring the "E" Green Line into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. City of Boston and powerful institutions like Northeastern ("We were involved from the very beginning of this project" -- NU official Jeanne Levesque) and the Fenway Alliance use opportunity to gentrify the Avenue, which will be renamed the "Avenue of the Arts."

Required community meetings held, but disability perspective on bricks either not heard or ignored.

April 9, 1999: Northeastern submits its Master Plan to the Boston Redevelopment Authority.

The Huntington Avenue improvement project will significantly improve the pedestrian environment through sidewalk widening and resurfacing, landscape improvements, new pedestrian crossings, new traffic signals, street lighting enhancement, signage improvements, tree plantings, and pedestrian amenities. (Page 10, "Pedestrian Circulation," my emphasis)

The problem with this plan is that it writes disabled people right out of the picture. It seems that disabled people don't count as "pedestrians," a group of people which seems to include only the designers and boosters of this project, and people who look like them.

The "sidewalk widening" the planners had in mind includes many new trees and their big grates (we have nothing against trees, we just don't want to have to compete with them for safe passage), which effectively narrows the path of travel to an uncomfortable, bare minimum.

To "improve the pedestrian environment" even further, the gaggle of gentrifiers introduce danger into the pedestrian experience with the most dreaded form of bricks known to humanity, "Original City Hall Pavers" (or " Dysfunctional Expensive Dangerous Broken Crap That Some People Like the Look of"). The do-gooding improvers just thrill to the site of the bricks' broken edges, uneven sides and that "weathered," "authentic" look. Trying to ride or walk over these bricks is sheer hell, as Jack Grieco and Alyson Perry explain eloquently below.

And guess what "new pedestrian crossings" means? That's right, it means a brick paver crosswalk designed to ensure that disabled people never escape the brickish hell that the gentrifiers have sentenced us to. These crosswalks have yet to be installed, and MBTA engineer James Eng told me that the MBTA would be fine with leaving the crosswalks out, as their installation would require digging up the street again.

Summer, 2003: Totally functional concrete sidewalk on Huntington Avenue from Massachusetts Avenue to Forsyth Way starts being ripped up and replaced with "Original City Hall Pavers". People with disabilities freak out.

August, 2003: At the request of NAG, City Councilor Michael Ross intervenes on behalf of of disabled residents, tries to persuade city to reconsider. City Engineer Peter Scarpignato says he will not stop the project. He had earlier told the Northeastern News, "It's going to be a beautiful renovation and something that we'll all be very proud of."

Contractor McCourt illegally leaves sidewalks inaccessible for months, and often fails to maintain temporary access. People are forced to risk their lives in the Street. The city does not notice.

September 9, 2003: Neighborhood Access Group and the Boston Center for Independent Living organize a protest against the switch to bricks on Huntington Avenue. Coverage in the Boston Globe, Boston Courant, Northeastern News.

Wheelchair user Paul Kahn tells the Boston Globe, "It's just bump, bump, bump, bump until you can't pay attention to anything else. It's really awful. It just seems crazy to go backward in accessibility in favor of some kind of pseudo-authentic look.

City Councilor Ross tells the Globe, "I'm hearing a group of residents who are saying, `I can't get around in my wheelchair because of the damage it does.' They're being jostled and vibrated on our streets when they're trying to get around. That's a powerful argument for me."

"One group's aesthetic preferences must not take precedence over the personal safety of another group," says John Kelly.

"We will have a very, very thorough public process," DPW Commissioner Joseph Casazza tells the Globe, "but I'm not going to bring construction to a screeching halt in this city. We're not changing our plans at this stage of the game anywhere."

October 3, 2003: Globe music critic Richard Dyer writes about a concert at Symphony Hall, where "high heels arriving on the Huntington Avenue side moved gingerly along the handsome but treacherous new brick sidewalk." Anyone who wears high heels has their own horror story about bricks.

NEXT: Part 2: City Hears Brick Horror Stories; Does Nothing

Friday, April 08, 2005

Derelection of Duty

Image of non-compliant curb ramp on Westland Ave, which was resurfaced about three years ago.
Westland Ave, across from sculpture island and Whole Foods Market. Because Westland Ave was completely resurfaced about three years ago, the city had the court-mandated ADA responsibility of bringing the adjacent curb ramps into ADA compliance. This curb ramp, which you still see quite a number of in the Fenway, was installed in the 1970s in a good-faith effort to provide access; unfortunately, no standards had been set then, and the city did the best it could. Experience has taught us that these ramps are dangerous because of their steep sides. The most effective curb ramp is one which is shallow, wide, and very gradual in its incline. This ramp is relatively steep and dangerously narrow. (Of course, the mud should also be removed, but that is a relatively minor problem.)

Photo Jacqueline O'Sullivan

Image of Westland Ave promontory between Westland and St Stephen St, across from Symphony Hall.
Westland Ave promontory between Westland and St Stephen St, across from Symphony Hall. This ramp was installed in 1987-88, because I remember being there with BCIL Access Advocate Pat Ryan. I remember him saying that it was not a very good ramp because it was slightly pitched, but again, this was before the ADA.

The problem here is that this ramp is a crucial element to an accessible Symphony neighborhood. Many people with wheelchairs from Symphony Towers need to use this ramp in order to safely access the stores at Church Park.
Photo Jacqueline O'Sullivan


It even gets worse. Coming soon: Even Steve Spinetto tried to get this ramp repaired!

Broken Promises

Image of crosswalk on Mass. Ave. with no curb cut anywhere in sight

Photo Jacqueline O'Sullivan
This "missing ramp" prevents people from crossing Mass Ave at Westland Avenue over to the Christian Science Plaza. (People can go by the driveway onto the plaza nearby, but that places people in danger from cars and Mass Ave traffic.)

It was promised to be installed in 2002.

Another broken promise.

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

On the disabled list

Posted by John B. Kelly

Sorry for the lack of posts, but I've been sick with toothaches, a virus , and a skin breakdown. And my mouth got ripped up by driving a sip/puff wheelchair while my mouth was numb...

And there is so much to talk about!

Coming soon: Huntington Avenue timeline. "Episode one: the gentrifiers strike back."